Here Today... Gone To Hell!

Guns N' Roses => Guns N' Roses => Topic started by: GypsySoul on July 05, 2005, 09:10:57 PM



Title: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: GypsySoul on July 05, 2005, 09:10:57 PM
AFD made their list at #2 and UYI I & II made it at #27.

(http://gypsysoul.lunarpages.com/hp705a.jpg)
(http://gypsysoul.lunarpages.com/hp705b.jpg)


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: jameslofton29 on July 05, 2005, 09:16:19 PM
Glad to see UYI starting to be on these lists. I think they should be rated higher, if not for the music, then for the boldness of releasing two albums on the same day. I know it happens periodically nowadays, but back then it was unheard of.


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: August 18th on July 05, 2005, 09:55:42 PM
appetite should've made number one, not metallica, and the illusions should've been ranked higher. but hell, how many bands can flaut a #2 ranking as the greatest metal record ever, PLUS have additional 2 albums on tha list. that's right, nobody but guns n' fucking roses. :smoking:


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: Saul on July 05, 2005, 09:59:20 PM
appetite should've made number one, not metallica, and the illusions should've been ranked higher. but hell, how many bands can flaut a #2 ranking as the greatest metal record ever, PLUS have additional 2 albums on tha list. that's right, nobody but guns n' fucking roses. :smoking:

Ummmmmmmmmmmmm ... Metallica had the #1 album on there PLUS THREE more.  ::)


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: August 18th on July 05, 2005, 10:16:55 PM
lol, guns are ten times better and the illusions weren't that metal anyway. 8)


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: blasphemer on July 05, 2005, 10:18:09 PM
where can i see this list

james cant sing :rofl:


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: August 18th on July 05, 2005, 10:19:55 PM
where can i see this list

james cant sing :rofl:

now there's a true statement if ever there was one.


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: Saul on July 05, 2005, 10:21:42 PM
lol, guns are ten times better and the illusions weren't that metal anyway. 8)

is there a point to what you just said? it doesnt change the fact that what you said in your 1st reply was ignorant to the very list in front of your eyes.  :confused:

and as for guns being ten times "better" then metallica , thats just subjective and nothing more then opinion. Go to a metallica board and the majority will say metallica are ten times better. So theres not much point to these lists when you get down to brass tacks.


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: August 18th on July 05, 2005, 10:23:54 PM
is there a point to what you just said?

yes. i didn't read the actual list you picky little whining bitch.


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: Saul on July 05, 2005, 10:26:38 PM
is there a point to what you just said?

yes. i didn't read the actual list you picky little whining bitch.

Thats just ignorance. Not the name calling but the fact you didnt bother to read the list before making an asinine reply about it. The fact that when called on it brought you down to the level of name calling and flaming says alot about your personality and is an infraction of the rules here.

Hopefully a mod will have a talk with you about it.  : ok:


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: August 18th on July 05, 2005, 10:27:35 PM
is there a point to what you just said?

yes. i didn't read the actual list you picky little whining bitch.

Thats just ignorance. Not the name calling but the fact you didnt bother to read the list before making an asinine reply about it. The fact that when called on it brought you down to the level of name calling and flaming says alot about your personality and is an infraction of the rules here.

Hopefully a mod will have a talk with you about it.? : ok:

hopefully you will get out of virtual kindergarten soon.


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: MikeB on July 05, 2005, 10:29:01 PM
If I would pick a 1#best album by Metallica it would be Master of Puppets. The Black album is an Mtv-whore album, it's overplayed too fucking much. Although I do like the songs Struggle within and Holier than Thou . It's a shame James is no longer a master at heavy riffs.


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: Saul on July 05, 2005, 10:30:42 PM
is there a point to what you just said?

yes. i didn't read the actual list you picky little whining bitch.

Thats just ignorance. Not the name calling but the fact you didnt bother to read the list before making an asinine reply about it. The fact that when called on it brought you down to the level of name calling and flaming says alot about your personality and is an infraction of the rules here.

Hopefully a mod will have a talk with you about it.  : ok:

hopefully you will get out of virtual kindergarten soon.

I'll graduate on August 15th.  : ok:

How about getting back on topic now instead of continuing your little "internet fight" ?  ::)


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: Saul on July 05, 2005, 10:33:27 PM
If I would pick a 1#best album by Metallica it would be Master of Puppets. The Black album is an Mtv-whore album, it's overplayed too fucking much.

IMHO , the same can be said for UYI. Geez , were those singles ever overplayed?! And then again , WTTJ , SCOM and PC were maybe in a lil bit too heavy rotation themselves.


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: August 18th on July 05, 2005, 10:36:35 PM
is there a point to what you just said?

yes. i didn't read the actual list you picky little whining bitch.

Thats just ignorance. Not the name calling but the fact you didnt bother to read the list before making an asinine reply about it. The fact that when called on it brought you down to the level of name calling and flaming says alot about your personality and is an infraction of the rules here.

Hopefully a mod will have a talk with you about it.? : ok:

hopefully you will get out of virtual kindergarten soon.

I'll graduate on August 15th.? : ok:

How about getting back on topic now instead of continuing your little "internet fight" ?? ::)

"you started it"
i'll go call a mod now


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: jameslofton29 on July 05, 2005, 10:39:27 PM
August, your comments are starting to get out of line. Alot of stuff you say is positive towards CD, and you make a few good points, but there is NO reason to personally insult anybody on this forum. Just because someone corrects one of your statements, it doesn't mean you have to resort to name calling. As my Grandma used to say, "If you cant take the heat, get the hell out of the kitchen!"


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: W. Botaxl Rose on July 05, 2005, 10:40:10 PM
I know it's imposible for these mags to put every "rock n' roll" act in their proper genre, but it's always strange to see Pearl Jam come in higher than Pantera & Megadeath on a "metal" list. ?:confused:


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: Saul on July 05, 2005, 10:41:29 PM
is there a point to what you just said?

yes. i didn't read the actual list you picky little whining bitch.

Thats just ignorance. Not the name calling but the fact you didnt bother to read the list before making an asinine reply about it. The fact that when called on it brought you down to the level of name calling and flaming says alot about your personality and is an infraction of the rules here.

Hopefully a mod will have a talk with you about it.  : ok:

hopefully you will get out of virtual kindergarten soon.

I'll graduate on August 15th.  : ok:

How about getting back on topic now instead of continuing your little "internet fight" ?  ::)

"you started it"
i'll go call a mod now

Please. You remarked , without even reading the list that nobody else could claim having 3 albums on there. I just pointed out the fact that metallica had four on there , one of them being number one.

If thats "starting" something then sir I ask you work on your people skills.

And please , back on topic now please?


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: IndiannaRose on July 05, 2005, 10:46:02 PM
Here we go again. :no: Anything even resembling Rock N' Roll gets labeled as "Metal" once again. Hah. :-X


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: MikeB on July 05, 2005, 10:48:35 PM
I don't really read those magazines about their opinion on albums, I always disagree with them . I wouldn't put Nirvana ?on that list.

Although there's metal bands I love but I don't listen to every metal band. That's what I can't stand about some Metalheads unlike me, they say if you don't like a specific metal band, you're not considered a metalhead. I 'm a metalhead too but I expand my taste in music not only like the same thing.


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: jameslofton29 on July 05, 2005, 10:50:53 PM
Saul you're right. I think UYI was played to the point of overkill even more than the Black album. I remember them doing videos for Illusions when Spaghetti had just been released.


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: blasphemer on July 05, 2005, 10:59:50 PM
If nirvana were on my list I'd put them at, oh wait I cant count that high. :rofl:


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: gilld1 on July 05, 2005, 11:24:37 PM
Do people still even read Hit Parader?  Talk about a trashy rag.


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: RichardNixon on July 05, 2005, 11:45:59 PM
A few years ago AFD was number one on the Hit Parader top 100, and Metallica was #2 or 3. And I think at one time KISS ALIVE was the #1 album. So it's basicly the same CDs, but it changes. It?s all kind of arbitrary, what?s the #1 album at any given time. On another note, I feel Metallica is wayyy overrated, but I can see why they?d pick the black album.  Good to see someone giving props to UYI. I wish SPIN and ROLLING STONE would follow suit.


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: W. Botaxl Rose on July 06, 2005, 12:14:33 AM
 The reason legit mags ignore the UYI's is because they r 2 seperate albums that just happened to be released on the same day. It's nice that HP puts them together, but they're wrong. Technically, they have different titles so u have to judge them seperately. And seperately they have no business being anywhere near any alltime great lists.


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: Lady Livin on July 06, 2005, 01:25:08 PM
Here we go again. :no: Anything even resembling Rock N' Roll gets labeled as "Metal" once again. Hah. :-X

It's the same thing with the term "rock star," and how people like Eminem and 50 Cent are allowed to be deemed such, merely because they're famous, have money, and are allegedly "bad to the bone." I roll my eyes every time a list like this comes out. It's always subjective, and I wish they never did it. I wish the only lists that came out were objective ones, like the best-selling albums, or the albums most people own, or the albums that either made it or broke it for certain bands. I enjoy early Pearl Jam, but they're the furthest thing from metal. Why do these rags feel obligated to always mention these huge, classic bands in their especially non-vague titled lists (metal), when they are clearly the furthest thing from it. Korn is another one; a band who have said they'd like to distance themselves from the term/type of music. Another reason why I fail to see the point of these types of lists is because these albums are all massively popular and are usually in everyone's collection already. Why rank the albums when people are always going to be discontent with where their favorite album falls if it's not #1? It just gets so old. But these types of lists have been produced for years... decades... so it's not anything new, but it IS still a trend that I wish would cease.


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: hyperionmax2003 on July 06, 2005, 07:59:14 PM
Guys, don't wanna sound like a smart ass, but i already posted GNR making it in Hit Parader Top 100 a while back.   : ok:


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: jameslofton29 on July 06, 2005, 08:03:32 PM
hyperion, I think I remember that. Maybe this is a new article or something.


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: N.I.B on July 06, 2005, 08:09:38 PM
Quote
74.Queen,Queen

How did Queen make the list? They're not metal  :confused:


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: Butch Français on July 06, 2005, 08:32:36 PM
I know it's imposible for these mags to put every "rock n' roll" act in their proper genre, but it's always strange to see Pearl Jam come in higher than Pantera & Megadeath on a "metal" list. ?:confused:

also funny to see GN'R ranked so high up in a genre they don't belong in!


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: GypsySoul on July 06, 2005, 10:02:58 PM
Guys, don't wanna sound like a smart ass, but i already posted GNR making it in Hit Parader Top 100 a while back.? ?: ok:

Sorry hyperionmax2003.? My bad.? :-[

Here's the link to your thread: 
http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/board/index.php?topic=20935.msg357199#msg357199


Title: Re: Hit Parader's Top 100 CDs in Metal History
Post by: Hoosier on July 07, 2005, 09:14:22 PM
this is about the 2nd worst "best ever" list ive ever sen. isnt HP a metal magazine? they droped a real turd with this one