Here Today... Gone To Hell!

Guns N' Roses => Dead Horse => Topic started by: boston on May 14, 2005, 04:08:35 PM



Title: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: boston on May 14, 2005, 04:08:35 PM
O.K.-----THE QUESTION - WHICH OF THESE CHOICES WOULD YOU RATHER SEE HAPPEN ?   

              1-Chinese Democracy is released, "New" Guns n Roses start touring and recording regularly.

               2-The Original Guns n Roses Reunite for a one time only farewell tour, and go out in style !

               3-Axl takes the stupid '80's lookin Bo Derek braids out of his hair, and finds out where he left his eyebrows..


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: dave-gnfnr2k on May 14, 2005, 04:10:11 PM
This is will sent to the dead horse section in 5-4-3-2-1....


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: anarchy on May 14, 2005, 04:10:47 PM
Oh you couldn't make a thread without taking a swipe at Axl, could you?


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: Voodoochild on May 14, 2005, 04:12:13 PM
Oh, my eyes.. !!!! I'm blind!!!  :crying: :smoking:


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: jameslofton29 on May 14, 2005, 04:19:57 PM
CD is the obvious choice. We need to hear what Axl has been doing all these years. You know something thats pathetic? In the time it took GNR to go from AFD to Illusions, the new GNR released 1 song. GNR-Izzy=nothing?


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: boston on May 14, 2005, 04:21:35 PM
Oh you couldn't make a thread without taking a swipe at Axl, could you?
Oh i forgot he is your god, so cool he can ruin the greatest band of my lifetime, and get cheered for it !, wake up, its done , its been done for a long time, Axl holds on to the name because of legal reasons, in the real world "new" guns n roses is not Guns n Roses , never will be no matter how hard you try to believe it, why dont we try The Axl Rose Project- that sounds more real !!


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: ppbebe on May 14, 2005, 04:24:39 PM
1       Take that!
U killed A Horse!


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: Carlos_f_Rose on May 14, 2005, 04:27:29 PM
Oh you couldn't make a thread without taking a swipe at Axl, could you?
Oh i forgot he is your god, so cool he can ruin the greatest band of my lifetime, and get cheered for it !, wake up, its done , its been done for a long time, Axl holds on to the name because of legal reasons, in the real world "new" guns n roses is not Guns n Roses , never will be no matter how hard you try to believe it, why dont we try The Axl Rose Project- that sounds more real !!

Welll ... those were tough words... but honests... and even go closer to reality...


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: anarchy on May 14, 2005, 04:29:27 PM
Oh you couldn't make a thread without taking a swipe at Axl, could you?
Oh i forgot he is your god, so cool he can ruin the greatest band of my lifetime, and get cheered for it !, wake up, its done , its been done for a long time, Axl holds on to the name because of legal reasons, in the real world "new" guns n roses is not Guns n Roses , never will be no matter how hard you try to believe it, why dont we try The Axl Rose Project- that sounds more real !!

I'm sorry, I always thought I was allowed my own opinions.  I didn't know you made them for me.


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: boston on May 14, 2005, 04:39:16 PM
Oh you couldn't make a thread without taking a swipe at Axl, could you?
Oh i forgot he is your god, so cool he can ruin the greatest band of my lifetime, and get cheered for it !, wake up, its done , its been done for a long time, Axl holds on to the name because of legal reasons, in the real world "new" guns n roses is not Guns n Roses , never will be no matter how hard you try to believe it, why dont we try The Axl Rose Project- that sounds more real !!

I'm sorry, I always thought I was allowed my own opinions.? I didn't know you made them for me.
Oh you are, Who's opinion is right is what matters, Where were you in 1987, watching guns play live, or in your high chair ??


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: anarchy on May 14, 2005, 04:48:03 PM
Oh you couldn't make a thread without taking a swipe at Axl, could you?
Oh i forgot he is your god, so cool he can ruin the greatest band of my lifetime, and get cheered for it !, wake up, its done , its been done for a long time, Axl holds on to the name because of legal reasons, in the real world "new" guns n roses is not Guns n Roses , never will be no matter how hard you try to believe it, why dont we try The Axl Rose Project- that sounds more real !!

I'm sorry, I always thought I was allowed my own opinions.  I didn't know you made them for me.
Oh you are, Who's opinion is right is what matters, Where were you in 1987, watching guns play live, or in your high chair ??

High chair. But of course you're older than me, so you must be a better fan than me.  ::)


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: boston on May 14, 2005, 04:52:03 PM
Oh you couldn't make a thread without taking a swipe at Axl, could you?
Oh i forgot he is your god, so cool he can ruin the greatest band of my lifetime, and get cheered for it !, wake up, its done , its been done for a long time, Axl holds on to the name because of legal reasons, in the real world "new" guns n roses is not Guns n Roses , never will be no matter how hard you try to believe it, why dont we try The Axl Rose Project- that sounds more real !!
I'm sorry, I always thought I was allowed my own opinions.? I didn't know you made them for me.
Oh you are, Who's opinion is right is what matters, Where were you in 1987, watching guns play live, or in your high chair ??

High chair. But of course you're older than me, so you must be a better fan than me.? ::)
No, I just Know what I am a fan of, All you know is new-gnr, you dont even know why we sit and type about a band that has not done nothing in over 15 years, u think its because of Madagascar, No it is because Appeteite for Destruction and the tour that followed, this was the closest thing to the perfect, not musical perfection per sey, but perfection of the spirit of rock n roll, that the world has ever seen


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: anarchy on May 14, 2005, 04:53:22 PM
You're a clown, I was a GNR fan long before I heard Madagascar.


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: boston on May 14, 2005, 04:56:11 PM
You're a clown, I was a GNR fan long before I heard Madagascar.
Did you ever see them play a show, And New-GNR dont count


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: anarchy on May 14, 2005, 05:14:15 PM
You're a clown, I was a GNR fan long before I heard Madagascar.
Did you ever see them play a show, And New-GNR dont count

No, because I was SIX YEARS OLD.  But whatever mate, you win the "who's got the biggest GNR e-penis".


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: boston on May 14, 2005, 05:28:42 PM
You're a clown, I was a GNR fan long before I heard Madagascar.
Did you ever see them play a show, And New-GNR dont count

No, because I was SIX YEARS OLD.? But whatever mate, you win the "who's got the biggest GNR e-penis".
My gnr penis  ::), you like it, actually it has shrunk quite a bit after what axl has done with the name, maybe he should market gnr toilet paper , so the rest of the world can wipe their ass on the name the way he already has


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: killingvector on May 14, 2005, 05:32:51 PM
Anyone have a good recipe for dead horse? I'm thinking brisket.


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: ppbebe on May 14, 2005, 05:35:52 PM
The older you are the pooper your hearing is. 8)

Anyway how many times you've seen GN'R or how long you'd been a fan doesn't mean a shit if you're not a fan of the existing band  NOW.

Quote
Anyone have a good recipe for dead horse? I'm thinking brisket.

hey, KV. I don't eat a horse. Mods do.  :hihi:


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: boston on May 14, 2005, 06:08:37 PM
The older you are the pooper your hearing is. 8)

Anyway how many times you've seen GN'R or how long you'd been a fan doesn't mean a shit if you're not a fan of the existing band? NOW.

Quote
Anyone have a good recipe for dead horse? I'm thinking brisket.

hey, KV. I don't eat a horse. Mods do.? :hihi:
[/quote"]The existing band now", are u sure their even is one ! I know AXl can do no wrong , he would never lie to you, never let you down


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: ppbebe on May 14, 2005, 06:41:53 PM
Quote
I know AXl can do no wrong , he would never lie to you, never let you down 

Oh do you? :o Come, on, He's just a human!

No human can do no wrong. He might lie to you for avoidable inevitable reasons and might let you down beyond his control.

But I think he is earnest. It's the thought that's counts.





Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: Skeletor on May 15, 2005, 06:23:54 AM
Stop being an ass, Boston. What are you trying to accomplish here? All your posts in this thread have been nothing but annoying trolling, get to the point already. So you don't want Axl to call his band GNR. What else?


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: slash4ever on May 15, 2005, 08:47:26 AM
Everyone knows a reunion is highly unlikely, but thats my vote. : ok:
But maybe Axl cud lose the braids ???


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: Dave_Rose on May 15, 2005, 06:34:59 PM
Surprise, Surprise another pointless thread


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: jameslofton29 on May 15, 2005, 06:37:43 PM
If its pointless, why are you posting in it?


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: mikegiuliana on May 15, 2005, 06:52:12 PM
i'd take the re union, but I want axl to do soemthing after all these wasted years on his solo project..


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: izzyrose on June 20, 2005, 04:20:19 PM
CD definitely. btw i just made this a very hot topic.lol.

                                                                :peace: izzyrose : ok:
                                                                                :beer:


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: Gunna_girl01 on June 22, 2005, 01:04:47 AM
Oh you couldn't make a thread without taking a swipe at Axl, could you?
Oh i forgot he is your god, so cool he can ruin the greatest band of my lifetime, and get cheered for it !, wake up, its done , its been done for a long time, Axl holds on to the name because of legal reasons, in the real world "new" guns n roses is not Guns n Roses , never will be no matter how hard you try to believe it, why dont we try The Axl Rose Project- that sounds more real !!

I'm sorry, I always thought I was allowed my own opinions.? I didn't know you made them for me.
Oh you are, Who's opinion is right is what matters, Where were you in 1987, watching guns play live, or in your high chair ??

you are very rude. you acctually discust me with the way you are talking to people.


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: Gunna_girl01 on June 22, 2005, 01:09:51 AM
i know axl has worked hard on his solo... but hey i think im going to go wit re-union.
i'd give anything to see them all back together...
without all the shit that has gone on in the last 5 years


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: duffsgal on June 22, 2005, 01:38:41 AM
I would take the reunion anyday - just imagine seeing Axl, Duff, Steven, Izzy and Slash back on stage together.? That would be better than any CD!! ? : ok:


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: Tied-Up on June 22, 2005, 01:48:34 AM
My choice is #4, cut boston's e-penis off with my Lorena Bobbitt knife and toss it in the e-garbage disposal.

After that, I choose #1, because I don't care who Axl's back up band is, for me, it's all about Axl.?

...and, just as a side note, I wasn't in a high chair in '87.


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: Gunna_girl01 on June 22, 2005, 01:51:56 AM
...and, just as a side note, I wasn't in a high chair in '87.

hope not  : ok:

you tell him mate boston's a fukin wanker


Title: Re: GUNS N ROSES VS. THE "NEW" GUNS N ROSES
Post by: Rob on June 22, 2005, 02:31:05 AM
My choice is #4, cut boston's e-penis off with my Lorena Bobbitt knife and toss it in the e-garbage disposal.

After that, I choose #1, because I don't care who Axl's back up band is, for me, it's all about Axl.?

...and, just as a side note, I wasn't in a high chair in '87.

Axl's back up band?  You're an idiot.  If you think Slash, Izzy, Duff, and Steven were a backup band then you have no idea what made GN'R great.  Axl was an amazing frontman, but without the great musicians and songwriters that USED to make up GN'R he never would've gotten anything done...kinda like he's doing now.