Here Today... Gone To Hell!

Guns N' Roses => Guns N' Roses => Topic started by: blasphemer on April 29, 2005, 09:42:28 PM



Title: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: blasphemer on April 29, 2005, 09:42:28 PM
According to Sp1at.com    merck says 2005.       Novemeber most likely.   Get ready folks its either the album or we kill merck!


Title: Re: Deathrow reaffirms 2005
Post by: ppbebe on April 29, 2005, 09:51:22 PM
Deathrow??? :nervous:


Title: Re: Deathrow reaffirms 2005
Post by: Graciela on April 29, 2005, 09:52:39 PM
Wow! Killing The Godfather. That's gonna be tough...


Title: Re: Deathrow reaffirms 2005
Post by: Dr. Blutarsky on April 29, 2005, 10:25:09 PM
Who the hell is the Godfather?


Title: Re: Deathrow reaffirms 2005
Post by: killingvector on April 29, 2005, 10:28:27 PM
Suge Knight can get Axl off his arse.

November is my birthday month!!!


Title: Re: Deathrow reaffirms 2005
Post by: Walapino on April 29, 2005, 10:29:44 PM
Can you dig that SUCKA!


Title: Re: Deathrow reaffirms 2005
Post by: AxlFink on April 29, 2005, 10:51:18 PM
what the fuck is up with this board?


Title: Re: Deathrow reaffirms 2005
Post by: killingvector on April 29, 2005, 10:52:53 PM
Diz board izt the snizzle, mofo.

Axl iz da pimp.

Anyone got a Federline to English Dictionary?


Title: Re: Deathrow reaffirms 2005
Post by: vicarious existence on April 30, 2005, 12:33:03 AM
I don't know what the hell happened to this board, but it's fucking funny as hell. FO SHIZZLE MAH NIZZLE!  :rofl:


Title: Re: Deathrow reaffirms 2005
Post by: Guns N Ballz on April 30, 2005, 08:35:43 AM
Deathrow Records is coming back? That'd be Snoop and Ice Cube right?  :P


Title: Re: Deathrow reaffirms 2005
Post by: WARose on April 30, 2005, 08:43:14 AM
what is tha godfather and deathrow? merck geffen ???


Title: Re: Deathrow reaffirms 2005
Post by: WARose on April 30, 2005, 08:43:53 AM
ok tha godfather is m erck


Title: Re: Death Row reaffirms 2005
Post by: ppbebe on April 30, 2005, 09:06:27 AM
It's getting worse n worse. :headscratch:

So... to sum up,

t h e West Coast posse announced  t hat T h e Death row reaffirmes  th e  r e l e a s e  o f  th e criminals  t his yr pbly November . o r  they are hanging T h e Godfather a n d a knight already asked Tha Pimpfather to dig stg( pbly a grave)?


Title: Re: Death Row reaffirms 2005
Post by: Death Cube K on April 30, 2005, 09:42:16 AM
Chinese Democracy in November maybe...

This board is killing me.


Title: Re: Death Row reaffirms 2005
Post by: GNFNRAXL on April 30, 2005, 09:46:45 AM
Ok let's try this again.? Is this board back to normal?? Qu'est ce qui se passe si je parle fran?ais?


Title: Re: Death Row reaffirms 2005
Post by: Axl8302 on April 30, 2005, 10:57:21 AM
haha,,, you mean sancutuary not death row.


Title: Re: Death Row reaffirms 2005
Post by: blasphemer on April 30, 2005, 11:40:53 AM
Here Ill decode it.    S a n c t u a r y = deathrow              the godfather =   m e r c k     s p l a t  = westcoast posse


srry my orginal post didnt make sense cause of this wanker talk but hope u can figure it out now.


Title: Re: Death Row reaffirms 2005
Post by: jfenderman on April 30, 2005, 12:14:14 PM
what does all this really mean anyway? :smoking:


Title: Re: Death Row reaffirms 2005
Post by: blasphemer on April 30, 2005, 12:26:50 PM
according to m e r c k  and s a n c u t u a r y   the album will be out in the last quarter of the year most likey november there sayin.


Title: Re: Death Row reaffirms 2005
Post by: The Estranged MrFlashbax on April 30, 2005, 12:29:25 PM
sounds good.. i aint holdin my breath but some word's better than none at all..


Title: Re: Death Row reaffirms 2005
Post by: killingvector on April 30, 2005, 12:33:12 PM
Axl
Merck
Sanctuary
GnR
kevin federline


Title: Re: Death Row reaffirms 2005
Post by: Axl Z on April 30, 2005, 01:54:33 PM
bout' time we says hello to ma little friend


Title: Re: Death Row reaffirms 2005
Post by: UziSuicide05 on April 30, 2005, 02:01:38 PM
What is with this board?


Title: Re: Death Row reaffirms 2005
Post by: Dr. Blutarsky on April 30, 2005, 03:34:49 PM
I don`t think financially they want CD in the can for too much longer.

This board cracks me up!  :hihi:


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Lord Kayoss on April 30, 2005, 07:47:50 PM
Until Axl says it himself - it is B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: blasphemer on April 30, 2005, 07:55:22 PM
Thats why we should hold merck to his word.  He has said this countless times. I mean for fuckssakes hes there manager. 2005 it better be as merck u have said.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: gandra on April 30, 2005, 07:59:07 PM
november rain???
i hope its the end of our waiting


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Twisted Nerve 85 on April 30, 2005, 08:59:39 PM
If merck is full of shit, I think that would call for an upside down crucifixtion. Whether its his fault or not.

Someone has to share in our suffering. lol   :peace:


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: jameslofton29 on April 30, 2005, 09:08:52 PM
Don't be shocked if at this time next year we have a "Sanctuary Reaffirms 2006" thread.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: damnthehaters on May 01, 2005, 12:52:22 AM
Ok here we go again, but lets say that it WILL be out in November of 2005 just for shits and giggles.  When would we first here something?  A statement? A release date? A single?

July?   August?   September? 


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: 33 on May 01, 2005, 05:27:13 AM
Don't be shocked if at this time next year we have a "Sanctuary Reaffirms 2006" thread.

Your a little negative ent ya dude?

Sorry if I sound like a stuck record but there are way to many negative people out there! Surely if thats how you feel about things, you dont need to post comments like that? When people are trying to read good stuff about the band. Surely you can just keep it to yourself until the album comes out, and then you will have nothing to be negative about!


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: estranged.1098 on May 01, 2005, 06:15:00 AM
Don't be shocked if at this time next year we have a "Sanctuary Reaffirms 2006" thread.

Why? Did Sanctuary ever affirmed a 2004, 2003... release? HELL NO!

Did Merck ever lie to us? HELL NO!



Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Voodoochild on May 01, 2005, 07:34:30 AM
Don't be shocked if at this time next year we have a "Sanctuary Reaffirms 2006" thread.

Your a little negative ent ya dude?

Sorry if I sound like a stuck record but there are way to many negative people out there! Surely if thats how you feel about things, you dont need to post comments like that? When people are trying to read good stuff about the band. Surely you can just keep it to yourself until the album comes out, and then you will have nothing to be negative about!
Indeed. I think some guys are here just to say something if the album fails to be released... Like "I told you so".  :no:
But hey, let' me believe. We don't want someone bitching about it in every thread, there's a frustation thread in Dead Horse. :rant:


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: AxlsMainMan on May 01, 2005, 11:37:37 AM
Ok here we go again, but lets say that it WILL be out in November of 2005 just for shits and giggles.? When would we first here something?? A statement? A release date? A single?

July?? ?August?? ?September??

Id at least hope to have some kind of positive news/outlook for fall during the summer months, but I wont hold out for a press release or official statement until lst week of August/mid-September.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: ppbebe on May 01, 2005, 12:22:29 PM
When would we first here something?  A statement? A release date? A single?

July?   August?   September? 

Mayyyyyyyyyyyyy.  :D


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Nytunz on May 01, 2005, 01:13:27 PM
Why would Sanctuary tell this to Sp1at and no one else? Because no one else is asking? Or because sp1at is just full og shit!  ???


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: loretian on May 01, 2005, 01:41:02 PM
Why would Sanctuary tell this to Sp1at and no one else? Because no one else is asking? Or because sp1at is just full og shit!? ???

Merck said it several times already, and then yes, we asked him again to reaffirm it.

I think some people should take as step back and read this news for what it is.? The CEO of Sanctuary, Gn'R's management company is saying 2005 is the year for Guns N' Roses.? That hasn't happened before, and as well all know, in the world of Gn'R, anything can change.? But, we do know they are planning on making this year the year, and based on other info we all know about, we can speculate that it'll be a 4th quarter release, probably in Nov.

That's what the news is.? Sanctuary is currently planning on making things happen this year, and are confident enough that it'll happen that their CEO has publically stated it. That's it - no bullshit, and we all know there's a chance it won't happen anyway.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Axl_Rose on May 01, 2005, 02:56:24 PM
If Axl had a sense of humour he would release it in September.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: the dirt on May 01, 2005, 03:23:09 PM
If Axl had a sense of humour he would release it in September.

Whay would that be funny?


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: jarmo on May 01, 2005, 03:25:17 PM
This is my "theory":


Merck: W, Axl Rose is not interested in fame, money, popularity or what the New York Times or any other paper for that matter might think of him. His only interest is making the best album he is capable of so that it can have a positive affect in 2005 on people who are enthusiasts of music and interested in Guns N' Roses. ?
Letter to the NY Times, March 6th, 2005

sp1at: 2005? Really?

Merck: Yes.

 :D

Then that was made into a news story...... Just my theory.




/jarmo


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Ali on May 01, 2005, 03:40:05 PM
This is my "theory":


Merck: W, Axl Rose is not interested in fame, money, popularity or what the New York Times or any other paper for that matter might think of him. His only interest is making the best album he is capable of so that it can have a positive affect in 2005 on people who are enthusiasts of music and interested in Guns N' Roses. 
Letter to the NY Times, March 6th, 2005

sp1at: 2005? Really?

Merck: Yes.

 :D

Then that was made into a news story...... Just my theory.




/jarmo

That's accurate.  Merck was asked again if they're still pushing forward with the intent of releasing the album in 2005, just to see if there's any indication things have changed in the past couple of months.

Ali


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: gigger on May 01, 2005, 03:47:52 PM
If Merck says Axl wants to make an album that "has a positive effect in 2005" then he's gonna have to release it in 2005 isn't he?

When we asked Merck if he meant that Axl wanted to make an album that "has a positive effect in 2005" he said that's what he meant when he said it.

Is Merck lying? That's up to you... His track record leads me to believe he's telling the truth... He hasn't lied before... why now?  : ok:


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: RustyCage on May 01, 2005, 04:56:57 PM
He hasn't lied before... why now?? : ok:

"IRS leak never happened"

"Buckethead not out of the band" (then confirmed by another he was indeed out at the time of the denial).

Are these considered lies?

Thought so.....


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Dave_Rose on May 01, 2005, 05:11:19 PM
I wont hold my breath!


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: jarmo on May 01, 2005, 05:24:40 PM
If Merck says Axl wants to make an album that "has a positive effect in 2005" then he's gonna have to release it in 2005 isn't he?

I hope so! Because it seems logical.... ;)






/jarmo


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: busngabb on May 01, 2005, 05:25:55 PM
He hasn't lied before... why now?  : ok:

"IRS leak never happened"

"Buckethead not out of the band" (then confirmed by another he was indeed out at the time of the denial).

Are these considered lies?

Thought so.....

The IRS leak thing was probably a calculated lie yes. Designed by the bands management and Axl to minimise the hunt for the recording.


The Buckethead issue was probably genuine, he was probably just out of the loop.

For what its worth I doubt Merck speaks to Axl regularly. In fact I'll bet that if Brain hasn't seen Axl for a year, Merck never has!


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Pandora on May 01, 2005, 05:28:34 PM
He hasn't lied before... why now?  : ok:

"IRS leak never happened"



If I remember correctly, he said something like "the GN'R camp didn't leak IRS", which doesn't mean the same at all.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: RustyCage on May 01, 2005, 06:53:45 PM
He hasn't lied before... why now?? : ok:

"IRS leak never happened"



If I remember correctly, he said something like "the GN'R camp didn't leak IRS", which doesn't mean the same at all.

I recall him saying the song never played on the radio. If the song leaked, someone from the gnr camp did it. I seriously doubt someone burglarized Axl's house and only took a demo. :D


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: chineseblues on May 01, 2005, 07:03:45 PM
He hasn't lied before... why now?  : ok:

"IRS leak never happened"



If I remember correctly, he said something like "the GN'R camp didn't leak IRS", which doesn't mean the same at all.

I recall him saying the song never played on the radio. If the song leaked, someone from the gnr camp did it. I seriously doubt someone burglarized Axl's house and only took a demo. :D

one word Geffen  ;)


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Pandora on May 01, 2005, 07:16:56 PM


I recall him saying the song never played on the radio. If the song leaked, someone from the gnr camp did it. I seriously doubt someone burglarized Axl's house and only took a demo. :D

Anyone working at the studio could have stolen it. Engineers are not what I would call part of the GN'R camp.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: erose on May 01, 2005, 08:21:13 PM
i thought gn'r was ready for launch right around rir4, but then it never happened....  seems like they've waited for vr and contraband to have it's run.... maybe....


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: RustyCage on May 01, 2005, 09:04:46 PM


I recall him saying the song never played on the radio. If the song leaked, someone from the gnr camp did it. I seriously doubt someone burglarized Axl's house and only took a demo. :D

Anyone working at the studio could have stolen it. Engineers are not what I would call part of the GN'R camp.

I think most people would come to the conclusion that an engineer working with Axl is somewhat a part of the "GNR camp" don't you?

But you are kinda reaching.....

Was it an engineer? Do you have inside info to share? :)


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: RustyCage on May 01, 2005, 09:07:09 PM
one word Geffen? ;)

That wouldn't suprise me. I am sure they are trying everything except pulling rabbits out of their ass to try to make Axl hurry up.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: vicarious existence on May 01, 2005, 10:18:01 PM
i thought gn'r was ready for launch right around rir4, but then it never happened....  seems like they've waited for vr and contraband to have it's run.... maybe....
Well then in that case they gotta worry about VR's second album due out in December  : ok:


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Pandora on May 02, 2005, 06:06:38 AM

I think most people would come to the conclusion that an engineer working with Axl is somewhat a part of the "GNR camp" don't you?

But you are kinda reaching.....

Was it an engineer? Do you have inside info to share? :)

I don't have any inside info whatsoever. I'm just speculating.

To me, the "GN'R camp" would be members of the band, the manager and I guess the record company, although that's stretching it a bit already....let's say key employees of the record company.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: michaelvincent on May 02, 2005, 08:29:39 AM
If 2005 is the year of GnR then Axl better hurry his bad self up since 2005 is nearly half over.

There's always 2006, right?


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Saul on May 02, 2005, 08:40:26 AM


There's always 2006, right?

unless the planet explodes , yes.  : ok:


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Voodoochild on May 02, 2005, 02:55:48 PM
There's always 2006, right?
Not exatcly "always".  :P


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: estranged.1098 on May 02, 2005, 03:19:00 PM
If 2005 is the year of GnR then Axl better hurry his bad self up since 2005 is nearly half over.

In other words, 2005 is not even half over.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: ppbebe on May 02, 2005, 03:21:59 PM
There's always 2006, right?
Not exatcly "always".  :P
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

It's available 'til the end of 2006.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: estranged.1098 on May 02, 2005, 03:56:20 PM

"IRS leak never happened"

"Buckethead not out of the band" (then confirmed by another he was indeed out at the time of the denial).

Are these considered lies?

Thought so.....

They are lies. Of course, it wasn't Merck who said those things.



Title: Re: Death Row reaffirms 2005
Post by: Jessica on May 03, 2005, 05:19:33 AM
Ok let's try this again.  Is this board back to normal?  Qu'est ce qui se passe si je parle fran?ais?

I may find you cute ?  :hihi:


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Jessica on May 03, 2005, 05:23:45 AM
why don"t we wait and see hmmm ?

Soon, most of you will go to beaches around the world and enjoy your summer holidays; This board and others will be desperately boring until mid september and nothing will happen because of the summer.

There is then a very short 3 months to xmas, not much to wait hmmm ?  :beer:


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Lord Kayoss on May 03, 2005, 06:36:36 PM
As I've said all along - there is absolutely NO reason to get your hopes up until it comes from the man himself.  Trust me - this will save you ALOT of grief and disappointment.

But I will say this - a good, genuine sign of the album getting close to being released will be when part or all of it is leaked to the net.  I don't care how much any band tries to keep it from happening - it is virtually impossible these days.

And I don't mean a shitty demo.  I'm talking about actual tracks from the finished product.  Till then - I ain't buying into any rumors.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Nytunz on May 03, 2005, 06:40:12 PM
As I've said all along - there is absolutely NO reason to get your hopes up until it comes from the man himself.? Trust me - this will save you ALOT of grief and disappointment.

But I will say this - a good, genuine sign of the album getting close to being released will be when part or all of it is leaked to the net.? I don't care how much any band tries to keep it from happening - it is virtually impossible these days.

And I don't mean a shitty demo.? I'm talking about actual tracks from the finished product.? Till then - I ain't buying into any rumors.

Great post !  : ok:  :-*


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: ppbebe on May 03, 2005, 06:45:03 PM
As I've said all along - there is absolutely NO reason to get your hopes up until it comes from the man himself.  Trust me - this will save you ALOT of grief and disappointment.
No worries! I ain't afraid of lil disappointment.

But are you sure there is absolute reason to get your hope up when it comes from the man himself?

Is he that trusty? ::)


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: shaved on May 03, 2005, 08:59:38 PM
What's with all the negative people on this board?  You trolls are acting like the cd has been constantly delayed for years, with rumor after rumor of possible release dates.   Until that happens, you can't show your negativity.






wait...


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: blasphemer on May 03, 2005, 10:49:48 PM
nice


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: SLCPUNK on May 03, 2005, 10:54:18 PM
You trolls are acting like the cd has been constantly delayed for years, with rumor after rumor of possible release dates.? ?






It has.... :P


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: blasphemer on May 03, 2005, 10:57:01 PM
dude he was joking,    Wake Up    Knock Knock  u there


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Lord Kayoss on May 04, 2005, 05:54:11 AM
As I've said all along - there is absolutely NO reason to get your hopes up until it comes from the man himself.? Trust me - this will save you ALOT of grief and disappointment.
No worries! I ain't afraid of lil disappointment.

But are you sure there is absolute reason to get your hope up when it comes from the man himself?

Is he that trusty? ::)

At this point, yes.

Main reason:  he has never failed to produce the album when it was promised yet - because he has never given a release date himself or issued a public statement claiming CD is finished.  People who claim to be around him and close to the project have taunted and teased and made false promises all the way.  There's no sense in listening to any of them.  Obviously none of them know what they're talking about because despite the dozens of claims from different "sources" over the years NOTHING has come to fruition.  And last time I checked the last person who out-right asked Axl if "Chinese Democracy" was coming out got a reply of "you'll see it (but) I don't know if 'soon' is the word."  Three years later no one can argue the fact that the man gave accurate info. 

So, if and when Axl officially reveals the release date - that will be good enough for me.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Mikkamakka on May 04, 2005, 06:39:26 AM
As I've said all along - there is absolutely NO reason to get your hopes up until it comes from the man himself.? Trust me - this will save you ALOT of grief and disappointment.
No worries! I ain't afraid of lil disappointment.

But are you sure there is absolute reason to get your hope up when it comes from the man himself?

Is he that trusty? ::)

At this point, yes.

Main reason:? he has never failed to produce the album when it was promised yet - because he has never given a release date himself or issued a public statement claiming CD is finished.? People who claim to be around him and close to the project have taunted and teased and made false promises all the way.? There's no sense in listening to any of them.? Obviously none of them know what they're talking about because despite the dozens of claims from different "sources" over the years NOTHING has come to fruition.? And last time I checked the last person who out-right asked Axl if "Chinese Democracy" was coming out got a reply of "you'll see it (but) I don't know if 'soon' is the word."? Three years later no one can argue the fact that the man gave accurate info.?

So, if and when Axl officially reveals the release date - that will be good enough for me.

January, 2001:

DJ: When is it gonna be the new album? Is it possible that we're gonna have a new record from Guns N' Roses?

Axl: Yes, I've heard. Um, hopefully we will put out a new single umm sometime this spring and then the record gonna be done in June or shortly thereafter.

http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/articles/showarticle.php?articleid=39


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: nesquick on May 04, 2005, 07:36:43 AM
Everybody seems ready: the record company, the members of the band, Merck etc...they are all standing for Axl's approvement. Come on Axl, let's go.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Warren on May 04, 2005, 08:25:43 AM
Quote

At this point, yes.

Main reason:? he has never failed to produce the album when it was promised yet - because he has never given a release date himself or issued a public statement claiming CD is finished.? People who claim to be around him and close to the project have taunted and teased and made false promises all the way.? There's no sense in listening to any of them.? Obviously none of them know what they're talking about because despite the dozens of claims from different "sources" over the years NOTHING has come to fruition.? And last time I checked the last person who out-right asked Axl if "Chinese Democracy" was coming out got a reply of "you'll see it (but) I don't know if 'soon' is the word."? Three years later no one can argue the fact that the man gave accurate info.?

So, if and when Axl officially reveals the release date - that will be good enough for me.

I don't agree. In 2002, Axl released an interview on gnronline. He said that it was the moment to wrap up the baby and that they were going to tour for 2 or 3 years. That was kind of a release date... :yes:


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: WARose on May 04, 2005, 08:42:05 AM
i believe it was finished in 2004, too. i think the main problem is that bucket left. brain told splat(!) that he saw axl the last time about one year ago....... :-\   that`s around rio4 , but we know NOTHING so.....

Quote
Quote from: gigger on May 01, 2005, 02:47:52 PM
He hasn't lied before... why now?  ok

"IRS leak never happened"

"Buckethead not out of the band" (then confirmed by another he was indeed out at the time of the denial).

Are these considered lies?

Thought so.....

he said that THEY didn`t leak anything and that`s the truth. i can`t say anything about this "buckethead out of the band" statement, but i don`t think he said it.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Warren on May 04, 2005, 08:50:02 AM
i believe it was finished in 2004, too. i think the main problem is that bucket left. brain told splat(!) that he saw axl the last time about one year ago....... :-\? ?that`s around rio4 , but we know NOTHING so.....



Nugnr problem is not Bucket leaving the band, as this has been a consequence of nugnr problems.

Bucket saw too many problems in this band, that's why he left.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: estranged.1098 on May 04, 2005, 08:57:30 AM
Bucket saw too many problems in this band, that's why he left.

That's only speculation.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Mikkamakka on May 04, 2005, 02:10:25 PM
Bucket saw too many problems in this band, that's why he left.

That's only speculation.


Like everything. That's how message boards work especially if there isn't any reliable interview or news.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: HK-47 on May 04, 2005, 02:23:49 PM
i believe it was finished in 2004, too. i think the main problem is that bucket left. brain told splat(!) that he saw axl the last time about one year ago....... :-\? ?that`s around rio4 , but we know NOTHING so.....



Nugnr problem is not Bucket leaving the band, as this has been a consequence of nugnr problems.

Bucket saw too many problems in this band, that's why he left.

I believe that Buckethead left GNR simply because he didn't fit in with the other members and because he was impatient with Axl's demands for perfection. Bucket is used to cranking out an album over the course of a month, and he's not usually too shy about leaving the mistakes in either. I doubt he could see any problems beyond his immediate needs/wants not being met. 


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: estranged.1098 on May 04, 2005, 03:29:22 PM

Like everything. That's how message boards work especially if there isn't any reliable interview or news.

Not everything, I think you're skipping a few threads.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Mr Cowbell ? on May 04, 2005, 06:38:23 PM
i thought gn'r was ready for launch right around rir4, but then it never happened....? seems like they've waited for vr and contraband to have it's run.... maybe....
Well then in that case they gotta worry about VR's second album due out in December? : ok:

Dont get me wrong VR is a good band but if Axl was to release CD VR would definently push back their release date


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Thorazine Shuffle on May 04, 2005, 06:43:54 PM
i thought gn'r was ready for launch right around rir4, but then it never happened....? seems like they've waited for vr and contraband to have it's run.... maybe....
Well then in that case they gotta worry about VR's second album due out in December? : ok:

Dont get me wrong VR is a good band but if Axl was to release CD VR would definently push back their release date

I'm of the opinion that VR would want to steal some of Axls thunder.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Mr Cowbell ? on May 04, 2005, 06:48:31 PM
Quote from: Thorazine Shuffle link=topic=20009.msg342572#msg342572
I'm of the opinion that VR would want to steal some of Axls thunder.
[quote


I can see them wanting to ride the GnR bandwagon but I don't think Scott could handle all the GnR comparisons and tolerate the press when they compare his album and his "different" lyrics.  There is no way VR would release an album the same time GnR is Releasing CD.  I could understand them releasing an album after their greatest hits, as they are riding the bandwagon, but they would only loose by trying to ride the CD wagon, because if CD is great VR will be over shadowed. If by some slim chance in hell CD is not great to the press, VR will have nothing to ride


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: jimmythegent on May 04, 2005, 09:09:16 PM
Quote from: Thorazine Shuffle link=topic=20009.msg342572#msg342572
I'm of the opinion that VR would want to steal some of Axls thunder.
[quote


I can see them wanting to ride the GnR bandwagon but I don't think Scott could handle all the GnR comparisons and tolerate the press when they compare his album and his "different" lyrics.? There is no way VR would release an album the same time GnR is Releasing CD.? I could understand them releasing an album after their greatest hits, as they are riding the bandwagon, but they would only loose by trying to ride the CD wagon, because if CD is great VR will be over shadowed. If by some slim chance in hell CD is not great to the press, VR will have nothing to ride

whats to say VRs next album is not great also and wouuldn't require the like of CD to ride on?
I for one think theres a great album lurking in the VR canon and their second one could well be it..


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: StoneTempleRoses on May 04, 2005, 09:59:27 PM
VR wouldnt push back there release date becouse of Chinese Democracy

StoneTempleRoses


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: AxlFink on May 04, 2005, 10:49:58 PM
why should they?  they know CD is going to be amazing and they shall always be ok.  no reason to hide from that fact.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: RustyCage on May 04, 2005, 10:54:47 PM
because he has never given a release date himself or issued a public statement claiming CD is finished.

"We will be back next summer with a whole bunch of new songs" - Axl Rose

 :D


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: estranged.1098 on May 04, 2005, 11:56:47 PM
because he has never given a release date himself or issued a public statement claiming CD is finished.

"We will be back next summer with a whole bunch of new songs" - Axl Rose

 :D

That's not a release date, nor a public statement claiming CD is finished.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: RustyCage on May 06, 2005, 07:07:26 PM
because he has never given a release date himself or issued a public statement claiming CD is finished.

"We will be back next summer with a whole bunch of new songs" - Axl Rose

 :D


That's not a release date, nor a public statement claiming CD is finished.

But it sure as hell put a timeline on it now didn't it?

"We will" is not the same as "we might".

The summer which he was refering to has long since passed.

Bands tour with new material to promote an album.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: chineseblues on May 06, 2005, 07:10:55 PM
because he has never given a release date himself or issued a public statement claiming CD is finished.

"We will be back next summer with a whole bunch of new songs" - Axl Rose

 :D


That's not a release date, nor a public statement claiming CD is finished.

But it sure as hell put a timeline on it now didn't it?

"We will" is not the same as "we might".

The summer which he was refering to has long since passed.

Bands tour with new material to promote an album.

the following summer he was referring to was 2002. They did play shows again in 2002. So I guess he was right  ;)


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Lord Kayoss on May 06, 2005, 09:11:15 PM
because he has never given a release date himself or issued a public statement claiming CD is finished.

"We will be back next summer with a whole bunch of new songs" - Axl Rose

 :D





That's not a release date, nor a public statement claiming CD is finished.

But it sure as hell put a timeline on it now didn't it?

"We will" is not the same as "we might".

The summer which he was refering to has long since passed.

Bands tour with new material to promote an album.

the following summer he was referring to was 2002. They did play shows again in 2002. So I guess he was right  ;)



Again - no release date.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Mikkamakka on May 07, 2005, 02:33:38 AM
because he has never given a release date himself or issued a public statement claiming CD is finished.

"We will be back next summer with a whole bunch of new songs" - Axl Rose

 :D


That's not a release date, nor a public statement claiming CD is finished.

But it sure as hell put a timeline on it now didn't it?

"We will" is not the same as "we might".

The summer which he was refering to has long since passed.

Bands tour with new material to promote an album.

the following summer he was referring to was 2002. They did play shows again in 2002. So I guess he was right? ;)

with a whole bunch of new songs


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Warren on May 07, 2005, 03:31:46 AM
In August 2002, Axl said : "It's time to wrap up the baby."

Read the gnronline interview, it is full of things that never happened... :(


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: chineseblues on May 07, 2005, 07:53:21 AM
because he has never given a release date himself or issued a public statement claiming CD is finished.

"We will be back next summer with a whole bunch of new songs" - Axl Rose

 :D


That's not a release date, nor a public statement claiming CD is finished.

But it sure as hell put a timeline on it now didn't it?

"We will" is not the same as "we might".

The summer which he was refering to has long since passed.

Bands tour with new material to promote an album.

the following summer he was referring to was 2002. They did play shows again in 2002. So I guess he was right  ;)

with a whole bunch of new songs

technically they were new songs to the people at those concerts  :P


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Carlos_f_Rose on May 07, 2005, 07:15:22 PM
At this point of our lives...  I think we better forget C.D.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: RustyCage on May 07, 2005, 09:41:26 PM
because he has never given a release date himself or issued a public statement claiming CD is finished.

"We will be back next summer with a whole bunch of new songs" - Axl Rose

 :D


That's not a release date, nor a public statement claiming CD is finished.

But it sure as hell put a timeline on it now didn't it?

"We will" is not the same as "we might".

The summer which he was refering to has long since passed.

Bands tour with new material to promote an album.

the following summer he was referring to was 2002. They did play shows again in 2002. So I guess he was right? ;)

with a whole bunch of new songs

technically they were new songs to the people at those concerts? :P

Uhhhh, what? :-\

The songs were 11 to 15 years old.

"Chinese Democracy starts now...... oh wait....in november, nevermind, I meant december, ah shit, don't wait for it."


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: chineseblues on May 07, 2005, 10:08:37 PM
because he has never given a release date himself or issued a public statement claiming CD is finished.

"We will be back next summer with a whole bunch of new songs" - Axl Rose

 :D


That's not a release date, nor a public statement claiming CD is finished.

But it sure as hell put a timeline on it now didn't it?

"We will" is not the same as "we might".

The summer which he was refering to has long since passed.

Bands tour with new material to promote an album.

the following summer he was referring to was 2002. They did play shows again in 2002. So I guess he was right  ;)

with a whole bunch of new songs

technically they were new songs to the people at those concerts  :P

Uhhhh, what? :-\

The songs were 11 to 15 years old.

"Chinese Democracy starts now...... oh wait....in november, nevermind, I meant december, ah shit, don't wait for it."


i was referring the chinese d, madagascar, the blues, and rhiad. When he played those in 2002 some of the people hadn't heard them yet.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: RustyCage on May 07, 2005, 10:33:06 PM
because he has never given a release date himself or issued a public statement claiming CD is finished.

"We will be back next summer with a whole bunch of new songs" - Axl Rose

 :D


That's not a release date, nor a public statement claiming CD is finished.

But it sure as hell put a timeline on it now didn't it?

"We will" is not the same as "we might".

The summer which he was refering to has long since passed.

Bands tour with new material to promote an album.

the following summer he was referring to was 2002. They did play shows again in 2002. So I guess he was right? ;)

with a whole bunch of new songs

technically they were new songs to the people at those concerts? :P

Uhhhh, what? :-\

The songs were 11 to 15 years old.

"Chinese Democracy starts now...... oh wait....in november, nevermind, I meant december, ah shit, don't wait for it."


i was referring the chinese d, madagascar, the blues, and rhiad. When he played those in 2002 some of the people hadn't heard them yet.

So those 4 songs are supposed to be the "whole bunch" of new songs he was talking about?

Oh well.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: estranged.1098 on May 07, 2005, 10:35:11 PM
This thread has been hijacked.   : ok:


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Naupis on May 07, 2005, 11:17:24 PM
VR will not push back a release date because Axl is finally putting out some music. If anything, that is the perfect time to release another album and play up on the publicity.

If anyone would get spooked about a VR release date around the same time of CD it would be Axl. You think Scott flies off the handle about GNR comparissons, just wait until Axl is asked about Slash and VR in every single interview he ever does. The guy will lose his mind.....or just stop talking to people. At which point the media will stop promoting him or GNR if he won't talk to them.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Judge Dredd on May 08, 2005, 04:20:19 AM
I can't see VR moving a release date for anyone.

But would they change a release date so that their record came out on the same, alleged date as a Guns record? :hihi:


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Warren on May 08, 2005, 04:28:37 AM
I can't see VR moving a release date for anyone.

But would they change a release date so that their record came out on the same, alleged date as a Guns record? :hihi:

That would be vicious, but I don't think VR would do that, neither the record company...


Anyway, Sanctuary can reaffirm whatever it wants : if the next Guns N'Roses album is released without Slash on it, it will be the BIGGEST FLOP EVER !!! : ok:


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Wooody on May 08, 2005, 05:26:09 AM
I can't see VR moving a release date for anyone.

But would they change a release date so that their record came out on the same, alleged date as a Guns record? :hihi:

That would be vicious, but I don't think VR would do that, neither the record company...


Anyway, Sanctuary can reaffirm whatever it wants : if the next Guns N'Roses album is released without Slash on it, it will be the BIGGEST FLOP EVER !!! : ok:

shut it redneck


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: HK-47 on May 08, 2005, 07:36:00 AM


Anyway, Sanctuary can reaffirm whatever it wants : if the next Guns N'Roses album is released without Slash on it, it will be the BIGGEST FLOP EVER !!! : ok:
A bigger flop than the Snakepit albums?  :o


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: mick on May 08, 2005, 12:04:20 PM


Anyway, Sanctuary can reaffirm whatever it wants : if the next Guns N'Roses album is released without Slash on it, it will be the BIGGEST FLOP EVER !!! : ok:
A bigger flop than the Snakepit albums?  :o

 ;D





Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: RustyCage on May 08, 2005, 05:50:23 PM


Anyway, Sanctuary can reaffirm whatever it wants : if the next Guns N'Roses album is released without Slash on it, it will be the BIGGEST FLOP EVER !!! : ok:
A bigger flop than the Snakepit albums?? :o

Oh plz.....Solo albums are not projected to be great successes. But CD on the other hand, is projected to change the face of todays music. And it will not live up to that hype with only one remaining (original)member. Face it or not, NO album can live up to that hype. And the longer it takes, the more the hype and anticipation builds. It's a catch .22 situation. It's a solo album with the GNR stamp on it.

Comparing snakepit albums to CD is a little ridiculous. ::) But it is obviously nothing more than a mediocre attempt to slam Slash.

FACT: Neither Slash or Axl will be as successful on their own as they were while in GNR together.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: Axl_Rose on May 08, 2005, 07:21:57 PM
If Axl had a sense of humour he would release it in September.

Whay would that be funny?

14 Years since the last album(s) of original material came out.


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: AxlStaleyWeiland on May 08, 2005, 08:42:12 PM


Anyway, Sanctuary can reaffirm whatever it wants : if the next Guns N'Roses album is released without Slash on it, it will be the BIGGEST FLOP EVER !!! : ok:
A bigger flop than the Snakepit albums?? :o

Oh plz.....Solo albums are not projected to be great successes. But CD on the other hand, is projected to change the face of todays music. And it will not live up to that hype with only one remaining (original)member. Face it or not, NO album can live up to that hype. And the longer it takes, the more the hype and anticipation builds. It's a catch .22 situation. It's a solo album with the GNR stamp on it.

Comparing snakepit albums to CD is a little ridiculous. ::) But it is obviously nothing more than a mediocre attempt to slam Slash.

FACT: Neither Slash or Axl will be as successful on their own as they were while in GNR together.
aint that the truth, even if CD is awesome, I believe the masses will be put off it doent sound like old GNR, I believe I will love CD if it comes out, but the masses, I dont know. Even if its great, I would be surprised if it outsells contraband


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: RustyCage on May 08, 2005, 08:56:19 PM


Anyway, Sanctuary can reaffirm whatever it wants : if the next Guns N'Roses album is released without Slash on it, it will be the BIGGEST FLOP EVER !!! : ok:
A bigger flop than the Snakepit albums?? :o

Oh plz.....Solo albums are not projected to be great successes. But CD on the other hand, is projected to change the face of todays music. And it will not live up to that hype with only one remaining (original)member. Face it or not, NO album can live up to that hype. And the longer it takes, the more the hype and anticipation builds. It's a catch .22 situation. It's a solo album with the GNR stamp on it.

Comparing snakepit albums to CD is a little ridiculous. ::) But it is obviously nothing more than a mediocre attempt to slam Slash.

FACT: Neither Slash or Axl will be as successful on their own as they were while in GNR together.
aint that the truth, even if CD is awesome, I believe the masses will be put off it doent sound like old GNR, I believe I will love CD if it comes out, but the masses, I dont know. Even if its great, I would be surprised if it outsells contraband

I'm sure most hardcore fans will like it. I know I will. But it will NOT top the success of old-gnr. Axl wanted to use the gnr name, well......good luck!


Title: Re: Sanctuary reaffirms 2005
Post by: echrisl on May 09, 2005, 12:49:47 PM
even if CD is awesome, I believe the masses will be put off it doent sound like old GNR

A better argument for why Axl should abandon the name and get one of his own has never been made.

It reads even better if you remove the "old" part ...